Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 347 F.3d 742 - Foster v. Carson

Foster v. Carson’s Empirical Analysis

347 F.3d 742 · 2003

Citation profile

73
cited by 73 later decisions
May 2024
most recently cited

24 federal appellate · 3 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 73 later decisions — most recently May 2024 · most notably Gatorcom Corp v. Ll Bean Inc, United States v. Strong (2007)

24 federal appellate · 3 district ·

340200320102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United States v. W. T. Grant Co. · Southern Pacific Terminal Company v. Interstate Commerce Commission · United States Parole Commission v. Geraghty · Preiser v. Newkirk · Bernhardt v. County of Los Angeles

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 73 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “If there is no longer a possibility that an appellant can obtain relief for his claim, that claim is moot and must be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Plaintiffs do not establish a reasonable expectation that they will be subjected to the challenged action again in the future. The only fact in the record before us that supports this claim is that it happened once. The mere fact that a similar order from the Chief Justice might someday issue does not establish a “reasonable expectation” that such an order will issue. We have held that a mere possibility that something might happen is too remote to keep alive a case as an active controversy.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “We do not have the constitutional authority to decide moot cases.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.