Johnson v. Cain’s Empirical Analysis
2009
Citation profile
2 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Williams v. Taylor · Mullaney v. Wilbur · Garner v. State of Louisiana Briscoe · Neal v. Puckett
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“any individual, sole proprietorship, partnership, corporation or other legal entity, or any unchartered association, or group of individuals associated in fact and includes unlawful as well as lawful enterprises and governmental as well as other entities.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Duhon“Although purporting to apply a 'separate and apart' requirement, the Sarrio court as a practical matter found that the State had proven a violation of the statute even though the enterprise existed for no other purpose than drug dealing.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Duhon
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.