Ware v. Richardson’s Empirical Analysis
1972
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently February 1996
4 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1331 · 28 U.S.C. § 1332 (Class Action Fairness Act of 2005)
Relies on Malone v. Bowdoin · Prairie Band of the Pottawatomie Tribe of Indians v. Udall · Twin Cities Chippewa Tribal Council v. Minnesota Chippewa Tribe · Martinez v. Southern Ute Tribe of Southern Ute Reservation · Native American Church of North America v. Navajo Tribal Council
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““In legal consequence, however, it operates as an arm of the Kiowa Tribe of Indians for it is completely controlled by them through their power of appointment. While it is nominally a state agency, it is statutorily freed of state control . and subjected to the unfettered control of the Tribe.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“an agency of the State of Oklahoma, possessing all powers, rights, and functions herein specified for city and county [housing] authorities created pursuant to this act.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.