Dyer v. Richardson’s Empirical Analysis
1972
Citation profile
1 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 405 (§ 205 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 416 (§ 216 of the Social Security Act of 1935)
Relies on Consolidated Edison Co of New York v. National Labor Relations Board · Consolo v. Federal Maritime Commission · National Labor Relations Board v. Columbian Enameling & Stamping Co. · Thomas v. Celebrezze · Ellerman v. Flemming
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“It must be enough to justify, if the trial were to a jury, a refusal to direct a verdict when the conclusion sought to be drawn from it is one of fact for the jury. Id., at 481.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Delk v. Richardson“more evidence is necessary to develop the facts necessary to determine the cause.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Newman v. Heckler
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.