Almarez v. Carpenter’s Empirical Analysis
1972
Citation profile
1 district · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently March 2016
1 district · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 753 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))
Relies on Griffin v. People of the State of Illinois · Boddie v. Connecticut · Olen (Allen) Lee v. Nathan Habib, Olen Lee v. Nathan Habib · Pomeroy's Lessee v. State Bank of Indiana · Almarez v. Carpenter
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““We cannot read Boddie to say that there is a constitutionally mandated right to a free reporter’s transcript even in a divorce case, and we surely can’t read it to hold that there is such a right in every civil case brought by an indigent.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.