Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 347 Ill. App. 3d 339 - Bergman v. Vachata

347 Ill. App. 3d 339 - Bergman v. Vachata’s Empirical Analysis

2004

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
1
states following
May 2021
most recently cited

16 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently May 2021

16 state decisions

80200420102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 63 Ill. 2d 48 - Lewis v. Dunne · 79 Ill. 2d 469 - Bowe v. Chicago Electoral Board · 156 Ill. App. 3d 201 - Huskey v. MUNICIPAL OFFICERS ELECTORAL BD., VILLAGE OF OAK LAWN · 284 Ill. App. 3d 886 - King v. Justice Party · 277 Ill. App. 3d 388 - Hagen v. Stone

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““We do not agree with the Knobeloch court’s interpretation of the Illinois Supreme Court case of DeFabio v. Gummersheimer [citation] as rejecting the substantial compliance theory for mandatory provisions. DeFabio was a case involving noncompliance, not substantial compliance. ‘Substantial compliance’ was neither raised by the parties nor addressed by the court in DeFabio. We interpret the DeFabio opinion as standing for the proposition, with which we agree, that mandatory provisions must be complied with even where parties agree there is no knowledge or evidence of fraud or corruption.” (Emphasis omitted.) Bergman, 347 Ill. App. 3d at 345 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.