¶1Decree affirmed. The petitioner appeals from a decree denying her petition that she be declared the owner of funds on deposit in several banks in the name of the respondent executors’ testatrix for whom the petitioner had worked as housekeeper for several years preceding the testatrix’s death in October, 1960. The petitioner contends that the bankbooks had been given to her by the testatrix. At the time of the testatrix’s death and for four years prior thereto, the bankbooks were in the possession of the testatrix’s conservator. The judge found that, although there were notations on several of the bankbooks and jackets, some bearing the testatrix’s signature, to the effect that the books were to be considered the property of the petitioner, the testatrix in fact had never made a delivery of and had never intended a gift of the bankbooks to the petitioner. The evidence, reported under G. L. c. 215, § 18, does not show these findings, decisive of the case, to be plainly wrong. Cohan v. Reardon, 313 Mass. 471, 472. Monaghan v. Monaghan, 320 Mass. 367, 369-370. Kobrosky v. Crystal, 332 Mass. 452, 460.
347 Mass. 779
Hardy v. Finger
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided June 1, 1964
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · decided 1964-06-01
Relies on Monaghan v. Monaghan · Kobrosky v. Crystal · Cahan v. Reardon
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1964-06-01
How this case has been cited
Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently January 2003
1 district · 5 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
View the full empirical analysis of this case →