Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 347 Md. 561 - Telnikoff v. Matusevitch

Telnikoff v. Matusevitch’s Empirical Analysis

1997

Citation profile

68
cited by 68 later decisions
2
states following
November 2016
most recently cited

6 federal appellate · 2 district · 56 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 68 later decisions — most recently November 2016 · most notably Baltimore Sun Co. v. Mayor of Baltimore (2000), Bowden v. Caldor, Inc. (1998)

6 federal appellate · 2 district · 56 state decisions

480199720002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on New York Times Co. v. Sullivan · Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc. · Curtis Publishing Co. v. Butts · Milkovich v. Lorain Journal Co. · Lovell v. City of Griffin

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 68 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A comparison of English and present Maryland defamation law does not simply disclose a difference in one or two legal principles. Instead, present Maryland defamation law is totally different from English defamation law in virtually every significant respect. Moreover, the differences are rooted in historic and fundamental public policy differences concerning freedom of the press and speech.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  2. “the established principle that a court will not decide a constitutional issue when a case can properly be disposed of on a non-constitutional ground”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  3. “one of fact, and the burden is on the defendant to prove ‘fair comment' ”; and there is”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.