Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 347 N.C. 48 - State v. Adams

State v. Adams’s Empirical Analysis

1997

Citation profile

50
cited by 50 later decisions
1
states following
November 2017
most recently cited

50 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 50 later decisions — most recently November 2017 · most notably State v. Nobles (1999), 130 N.C. App. 675 - State v. Davis (1998)

50 state decisions

360199720002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Ashe v. Swenson · Wainwright v. Witt · McKoy v. North Carolina · Bullington v. Missouri · State v. Odom

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 50 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[a] murder in the home 'shocks the conscience, not only because a life was senselessly taken, but because it was taken [at] an especially private place, one [where] a person has a right to feel secure'”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “`When the trial court instructs the jury not to consider incompetent evidence, any prejudice is ordinarily cured.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “The [Supreme] Court was asked to determine whether the State may prosecute a defendant a second time for armed robbery where the jury at defendant's first trial found the State did not meet its burden of proof on the issue of identifying defendant as one of the perpetrators. In Ashe , the Court held that prior acquittal of an essential issue precludes the State, on double jeopardy grounds, from trying defendant on that issue again[.] ... "[W]hen an issue of ultimate fact has once been determined by a valid and final judgment, that issue cannot again be litigated between the same parties in any future lawsuit."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.