State v. Kolobakken’s Empirical Analysis
1984
Citation profile
6 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently January 2002
6 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Patterson v. United States · United States v. California · United States v. Knox · Haywood v. United States · Powell v. National Savings & Trust Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““[Rule 12(b), NDRCrimP] provides no authority for a court to grant a pretrial motion to dismiss based on a defense ‘which raises factual questions embraced in the general issue.’ United States v. Brown, 481 F.2d 1035, 1041 (8th Cir.1973). “For this reason, courts have denied pretrial efforts to have charges dismissed which were based on defenses of entrapment ... withdrawal ... and insufficiency of the evidence_” [Emphasis added; citations omitted.]”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. O'BOYLE
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.