State v. Oliphant’s Empirical Analysis
2009
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
March 2019
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“an irrelevant issue-the arresting officers' actual state of mind-into the jury's deliberations concerning [the defendant's] claim of self-defense.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“had a right to have the jury consider the circumstances surrounding the event from his own point of view”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“"Instead, Wood was entitled to have his right to self-defense explained to the jury in terms of what a reasonable person in his position would have believed was occurring. What the officers believed was not (indeed, could not have been) any part of Wood's state of mind."”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.