State v. Luman’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

4 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “"Once private parties have seized a piece of evidence, examined it, and delivered it to a police officer (thereby giving the police officer lawful possession of that evidence for criminal investigatory purposes), the police officer's subsequent, confirmatory examination of that evidence involves no additional injury to any privacy interest of the property owner; any privacy interest that the property owner once may have had in that piece of evidence is destroyed, at least to the extent of the scope of the private search."”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 235 Or. App. 477 - State v. STOKKE

2. “a private search frustrates a person's right to privacy under Oregon's Constitution exactly to the same extent that it frustrates a person's expectation of privacy under the federal constitution”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 235 Or. App. 477 - State v. STOKKE

3. “[I]f the police do not invade a protected privacy interest by examining a piece of evidence, a `search' does not occur and no warrant is necessary.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 235 Or. App. 477 - State v. STOKKE