Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 347 Pa. 130 - Shafer Petition

Shafer Petition’s Empirical Analysis

1943

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
1
states following
July 2010
most recently cited

18 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently July 2010

18 state decisions

6019431950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 29 U.S.C. § 151 (§ 1 of the National Labor Relations Act)

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““(c) Whenever a question arises concerning the representation of employes the board may, and, upon request of a labor organization, . . . shall investigate such controversy and certify to the parties, in writing, the name or names of the representatives who have been designated or selected.””
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““Although an ‘unfair’ employer has no right, under the first sentence, to initiate an investigation concerning representation, he may, as a party to the controversy after it has been properly instituted, demand a secret ballot.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. ““Whenever a question arises concerning the representation of employes the board may, and, upon request of a labor organization, or an employer who has not committed an act herein defined as unfair labor practice, or any group of employes . . . representing . . . thirty percentum or more of the employes of that unit, shall investigate such controversy and certify . . . the names of the représentatives. . . . The Board . . . may utilize any suitable method to ascertain such representatives, except that if either party to the controversy so requests, a secret ballot of employes shall be taken within twenty days. . . .””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.