Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 347 Pa. 445 - Commonwealth v. Komatowski

Commonwealth v. Komatowski’s Empirical Analysis

1943

Citation profile

44
cited by 44 later decisions
1
states following
April 2004
most recently cited

44 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 44 later decisions — most recently April 2004 · most notably Commonwealth v. Comber (1953), Commonwealth v. Soudani (1960)

44 state decisions

1901943195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Ex Parte Milligan · Commonwealth Ex Rel. Moszczynski v. Ashe · Walters v. Commonwealth

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 44 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““When a jury tenders a verdict which is defective in substance, uncertain, repugnant, or not responsive to the issue, it is proper for the court to reject it, as not warranted by law, call the attention of the jury to the defect, instruct them as to the form of verdict in case they mean to acquit or convict the defendant and send them back to their room where they can, untrammeled by the presence and influence of others, find such verdict as they think proper.” (Emphasis added.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “No authority is needed to sustain the proposition that a defendant cannot be legally convicted of a crime neither charged in the indictment nor a necessary constituent of any crime so charged, but on those rare occasions when such a question has come before the appellate courts of this State they have consistently held as we hold in this case that such a conviction is a nullity.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.