Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 347 Pa. Super. 333 - Commonwealth v. McGeth

347 Pa. Super. 333 - Commonwealth v. McGeth’s Empirical Analysis

1985

Citation profile

23
cited by 23 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
2
states following
August 2007
most recently cited

21 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 23 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently August 2007

21 state decisions

130198519902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Anders v. California · Commonwealth Ex Rel. Washington v. Maroney · Commonwealth v. Hubbard · Commonwealth v. Pettus

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “There are two purposes to be served by counsel’s filing a brief that refers to anything in the record that might arguably support the appeal: (1) it gives the reviewing court a basis upon which to decide if the appeal is, in fact, frivolous, and (2) it gives indigent defendants, “as nearly as is practicable” that which is guaranteed them under the Sixth and the Fourteenth amendments, the right to counsel (and, in the process, protects counsel from ineffectiveness allegations).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “It should be emphasized that lack of merit in an appeal is not the legal equivalent of frivolity. Anders “appears to rest narrowly on the distinction between complete frivolity and absence of merit. The latter is not enough to support either a request by counsel to withdraw, nor the granting of such a request by the court.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.