Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 347 Pa. Super. 564 - Commonwealth v. Richardson

347 Pa. Super. 564 - Commonwealth v. Richardson’s Empirical Analysis

1985

Citation profile

28
cited by 28 later decisions
9
states following
April 2015
most recently cited

28 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 28 later decisions — most recently April 2015 · most notably 111 Wash. 2d 124 - State v. Brown (1988), 355 Pa. Super. 145 - Commonwealth v. Duffy (1986)

28 state decisions

1101985199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2

Relies on Neil v. Biggers · Manson v. Brathwaite · Luce v. United States · New Jersey v. Portash · Commonwealth v. Bighum

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “1) the degree to which the commission of the prior offense reflects upon the veracity of the defendant-witness; 2) the likelihood, in view of the nature and extent of the prior record, that it would have a greater tendency to smear the character of the defendant and suggest a propensity to commit the crime for which he stands charged, rather than provide a legitimate reason for discrediting him as an untruthful person; 3) the age and circumstances of the defendant; 4) the strength of the prosecution’s case and the prosecution’s need to resort to this evidence as compared with the availability to the defense of other witnesses through which its version of the events surrounding the incident can be presented; and 5) the existence of alternative means of attacking the defendant’s credibility.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.