Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

347 S.C. 115

State v. Clarkson

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided October 1, 2001

Supreme Court of South Carolina · decided 2001-10-01

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently July 2002

2 state decisions

Relies on State v. Elliott · State v. Elliott · State v. Clarkson

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2001-10-01

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEALS

PER CURIAM:

¶2Respondent was indicted for assault with intent to commit criminal sexual conduct against a minor in the second degree (ACSC) and pled guilty to assault and battery of a high and aggravated nature (ABHAN). The Court of Appeals vacated his guilty plea. State v. Clarkson, 337 S.C. 518, 523 S.E.2d 817 (Ct.App.1999). The State has filed a petition for a writ of certiorari seeking review of the Court of Appeals’ opinion. We grant the petition for a writ of certiorari, dispense with further briefing and reverse the decision of the Court of Appeals.

¶3Relying on its opinion in State v. Elliott, 335 S.C. 512, 517 S.E.2d 713 (Ct.App.1999), the Court of Appeals determined respondent’s guilty plea should be vacated because ABHAN is not a lesser-included offense of ACSC. This Court recently reversed the decision of the Court of Appeals in Elliottand held that ABHAN is a lesser-included offense of ACSC. State v. Elliott, Op. No. 25356, 552 S.E.2d 727 (S.C.Sup.Ct.2001). Accordingly, the Court of Appeals erred in vacating respondent’s guilty plea.

¶4REVERSED.

TOAL, C.J., MOORE, WALLER, BURNETT and PLEICONES, JJ., concur.
/347/sc/115 · .json · Public domain