347 So. 2d 1021 - Fresneda v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1977
Citation profile
88 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 88 later decisions — most recently November 2007 · most notably 573 So. 2d 330 - State v. Hawthorne (1991), Glaubius v. State (1997)
88 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on State v. Barnett · People v. Becker
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 88 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[A] condition of probation requiring a probationer to pay money to, and for the benefit of, the victim of his crime cannot require payment in excess of the amount of damage the criminal conduct caused the victim.”
12 later decisions quote this exact passage“[a]s part of the community control program to be implemented by the department, [may] order the child or parent to make restitution for the damage or loss caused by his offense in a reasonable amount or manner to be determined by the court.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage“There is no basis in the record for distinguishing between injuries sustained in either of the collisions from aggravation of those injuries attributable to such delay, if any, in securing medical attention as the appellant may have caused. ... Of course, the figure in the present case presumably bears some relationship to the accident out of which the prosecution arose, but it is not clear what the relationship to appellant's offense is.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.