Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 347 So. 2d 184 - State v. Williams

347 So. 2d 184 - State v. Williams’s Empirical Analysis

1977

Citation profile

29
cited by 29 later decisions
1
states following
April 2017
most recently cited

29 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 29 later decisions — most recently April 2017 · most notably 391 So. 2d 421 - State v. Gibson (1980), State v. Davis (1982)

29 state decisions

19019771980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Alexander v. Virginia · State v. Dotson · 337 So. 2d 502 - State v. Dabon

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"When an indictment is amended, unless a defendant moves for a continuance on the ground that he is prejudiced thereby and requires additional time to prepare his defense, he cannot later contend that he was prejudiced by the amendment. La.Code Crim.Pro. art. 489."”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “October, 1979 to May, 1980.” Id. at 627 . The Third Circuit held that the date is not an essential element of the crime of attempted aggravated rape, and thus, the trial court properly allowed the State to amend the indictment. The court further found that although the defendant objected to the trial court’s ruling allowing the state to amend the indictment, no motion for a continuance was made by the defendant. Accordingly, the court held that”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.