347 So. 2d 225 - State v. Norris’s Empirical Analysis
1977
Citation profile
8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
December 1987
most recently cited
8 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 340 So. 2d 1382 - State v. Williams
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“See also La.Code Crim.Pro. arts. 875-76; La.Rev.Stat. 15:574.12. For the reasons assigned, the conviction and sentence are affirmed. TATE, Justice, concurring: I concur, but with reservations as to the rationale and result as to Assignment 2. DENNIS, J., concurs and assigns reasons. DENNIS, Justice, concurring. The majority's reliance on La.R.S. 15:455 is misplaced. The”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.