Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 347 SO2D 39 - Shaw v. Caddo Parish School Bd.

Shaw v. Caddo Parish School Bd.’s Empirical Analysis

1977

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
1
states following
November 2008
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 11 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently November 2008

1 federal appellate · 11 state decisions

401977198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State Ex Rel. Rathe v. Jefferson Parish School Board · Watkins v. Ouachita Parish School Board · Jefferson Parish School Board v. Jefferson Parish Democratic Executive Committee · 243 So. 2d 915 - Disposal Systems, Inc. v. Calcasieu Parish School Bd. · 220 So. 2d 534 - Blanchet v. Vermilion Parish School Board

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “There is nothing more firmly established in law than the principle that, within the limits of their authority, the power and discretion of legally created governing boards is supreme. Their wisdom or good judgment cannot be questioned by the courts. Members of these boards are appointed or elected because of their peculiar fitness for the post. Judges are elected because of their legal knowledge and ability. They are not experienced in the business affairs of Parishes and municipalities, * * * or the conduct of a public school system. A presumption of legality and regularity attaches to the action of all government boards. It is only when it is clearly shown that the action of such a board is beyond its authority or is arbitrary, unreasonable, or fraudulent that a court is justified in interfering. ... It is indisputable that the jurisprudence of this State is settled beyond doubt that where a statute creates a Board and grants to it certain administrative and executive functions and responsibilities, the courts will not interfere with the bona fide judgment of the Board based upon substantial evidence. It is only where the complaintant shows there has been an invasion of his rights by the Board exceeding its powers or doing him an injustice that the courts have set aside the actions of the Board * * *”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.