¶1Affirmed. Pierson v. Sharp, 283 So.2d 880 (Fla. 4th DCA 1973); Schmidt v. Reyes, 274 So.2d 242 (Fla. 1st DCA 1973); Curtiss-Wright Corp. v. King, 207 So.2d 294 (Fla. 3d DCA 1968); Johnson v. Eatonville, 203 So.2d 664 (Fla. 4th DCA 1967); Davis v. Zona, 198 So.2d 43 (Fla. 2d DCA 1967); Best v. Barnette, 130 So.2d 90 (Fla. 2d DCA 1961); Broward County Port Authority v. F. M. Rule & Co., 119 So.2d 82 (Fla. 2d DCA 1960).
347 So. 2d 630
Higgins v. Higgins
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided May 6, 1977
District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1977-05-06
Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently February 2015
2 state decisions
Relies on Broward County Port Authority v. FM Rule & Co. · Johnson v. Town of Eatonville · 283 So. 2d 880 - Pierson v. Sharp
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1977-05-06
View the full empirical analysis of this case →