Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 347 SO2D 664 - Essix v. State

Essix v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1977

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
August 2001
most recently cited

8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently August 2001

8 state decisions

501977198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Mizell v. New Kingsley Beach, Inc. · Barker v. Randolph

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The extent to which parties may be permitted to go in examining prospective jurors on voir dire is subject to the sound discretion of the trial judge, the exercise of which will not be interfered with unless it is clearly abused.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.