Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 347 S.W.3d 142 - Shaw v. State

Shaw v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2011

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
March 2014
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State v. Brookshire · State Ex Rel. Zinna v. Steele · Soto v. State · State v. Patterson · White v. St. Louis Teachers Union

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The motion court made no such express finding. Based upon our review of the transcript from the evidentiary hearing, we find no support whatsoever for the State’s argument that the judge made an implicit finding to that effect. In point of fact, what the judge said was that he ‘thought’ he had imposed consecutive sentences. He never stated that the official transcript was in error.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “If there is any dispute concerning the correctness of any legal file or transcript, or if the parties fail to agree within a reasonable time as to its correctness, the legal file or transcript shall be settled and approved.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.