Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 347 SW3D 552 - State v. WILBERS

State v. WILBERS’s Empirical Analysis

2011

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
March 2019
most recently cited

7 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Illinois v. Gates · United States v. Leon · Franks v. Delaware · Adams v. Williams · United States v. Ventresca

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “1) if the affiant provides information he knows or should know is false; 8 2) the magistrate [or judge] wholly abandons his judicial role; 3) if the affidavit is so lacking in probable cause as to render official belief in its existence entirely unreasonable; or 4) if the warrant is so facially deficient the executing officers cannot reasonably presume it to be valid.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.