Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 347 SW3D 720 - Wilkerson v. State

Wilkerson v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2011

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
1
states following
October 2016
most recently cited

11 state decisions

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from Texas 9th Judicial District Court)

Relationships

Relies on Furman v. Georgia · Harmelin v. Michigan · Woodson v. North Carolina · Graham v. Florida · Geesa v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The powers of the Government of the State of Texas shall be divided into three distinct departments, each of which shall be confided to a separate body of magistracy, to wit: Those which are Legislative to one; those which are Executive to another, and those which are Judicial to another; and no person, or collection of persons, being of one of these departments, shall exercise any power properly attached to either of the others, except in the instances herein expressly permitted.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.