Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 347 WIS2D 30 - State v. Gerald D. Taylor

State v. Gerald D. Taylor’s Empirical Analysis

2013

Citation profile

33
cited by 33 later decisions
1
states following
June 2024
most recently cited

33 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Boykin v. Alabama · Coleman v. Thompson · Marshall v. Lonberger · 131 Wis. 2d 246 - State v. Bangert · 201 Wis. 2d 303 - State v. Bentley

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 33 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “will not be disturbed unless the defendant shows that it is necessary to correct a manifest injustice.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “defendant's plea [is] entered knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily when the record makes clear that the defendant knew 22 No. 2014AP2488-CR.akz the maximum penalty that could be imposed and was verbally informed at the plea hearing of the penalty that he received.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “A plea is 'manifestly unjust' in 8 No. 2020AP616-CR violation of the Due Process Clause of the United States Constitution if it was not entered 'knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily.'”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.