State v. Matthew R. Steffes’s Empirical Analysis
2013
Citation profile
22
cited by 22 later decisions
1
states following
February 2026
most recently cited
20 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Batchelder · State Ex Rel. Kalal v. Circuit Court for Dane County · State v. Pettit · 153 Wis. 2d 493 - State v. Poellinger · 153 Wis. 2d 121 - State v. Johnson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The guilty verdicts allowed the court to infer that the jury found more credible other testimony, such as Benes' scrutiny of UDAs, Pierce's QuickBooks files, invoices, cancelled checks, and bank statements. B. Five Counts of Theft by Fraud ¶25 The theft-by-fraud statute, WIS. STAT. § 943.20(1)(d), makes it a crime to obtain”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“title to property of another person by intentionally deceiving the person with a false representation which is known to be false, made with intent to defraud, and which does defraud the person to whom it is made.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[C]ourts will not ordinarily render advisory opinions where the questions propounded have not arisen and may never arise.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.