In Re Davis’s Empirical Analysis
2006
Citation profile
29
cited by 29 later decisions
August 2013
most recently cited
2 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 1322
Relies on In Re Alexander · In Re McGuire · In Re Schanuth · In Re Fuger · In Re Dew
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“$ ‡ ‡ ‡ ‡ ‡ (B) may be less than 3 or 5 years, whichever is applicable under subpara-graph (A), but only if the plan provides for payment in full of all allowed unsecured claims over a shorter period.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. In Re McGillis · In Re Green“The terms “commitment” and “period” are ... terms that by their ordinary, everyday meaning contemplate or suggest action by the debtor over a period of time. They connote an obligation to do something over a period of time. They do not on their face connote a formula to arrive at a value or an amount, at least not in their ordinary everyday meaning.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In Re Grant
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.