In Re Jackson’s Empirical Analysis
2006
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 3 district ·
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 102 · 11 U.S.C. § 105 · 11 U.S.C. § 109 · 11 U.S.C. § 1307 · 11 U.S.C. § 301 · 11 U.S.C. § 302 · 11 U.S.C. § 341 · 11 U.S.C. § 362
Relies on Southeastern Community College v. Davis · Perrin v. United States · Diamond v. Chakrabarty · Tenney v. Terry · Gusam Restaurant Corp. v. Speciner
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Subject to paragraph (4) and with respect to a case described in paragraph (1), any party in interest may request the court to enter an order dismissing the case. If requested, the court shall enter an order of dismissal not later than 5 days after such request.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. In Re Tay-Kwamya · In Re Spencer“its sua sponte dismissals under section 521(i)(l) have not been giving proper deference to the current statutory scheme. By not applying its section 105(a) power to 11 U.S.C. section 521 (i)(2) and by exercising its right to “order otherwise” under 11 U.S.C. section 521 (a)(1)(B), this Court should be able to prevent most abuses of process.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In Re Brickey
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.