Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 348 F.2d 164 - William H. Legate v. J. Joseph Maloney, Jr., Receiver

William H. Legate v. J. Joseph Maloney, Jr., Receiver’s Empirical Analysis

348 F.2d 164 · 1965

Citation profile

27
cited by 27 later decisions
1
states following
April 2010
most recently cited

18 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 27 later decisions — most recently April 2010 · most notably Greater Boston Television Corporation v. Federal Communications Commission, Whdh, Inc., a Massachusetts Corporation, Intervenor. Whdh, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission, Greater Boston Television Corporation, a Massachusetts Corporation, Intervenor. Charles River Civic Television, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission, Whdh, Inc., Boston Broadcasters Inc., Intervenors. Whdh, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission, Boston Broadcasters, Inc., Intervenor. Greater Boston Tv Co., Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission, Whdh, Inc., Boston Broadcasters Inc., Intervenors (1971), Laffey v. Northwest Airlines, Inc. (1984)

18 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

110196519701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on New York Stock Exchange v. Legate · William H. Legate v. J. Joseph Maloney, Jr., Receiver · Securities & Exchange Commission v. duPont, Homsey & Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “after denial of petitions for rehearing and certiorari.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.