Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 348 F.2d 40 - Heasley v. United States

Heasley v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

348 F.2d 40 · 1965

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
May 1981
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently May 1981

1 federal appellate · 1 district ·

10196519701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2001

Relies on United States v. Sherwood · Commissioner v. Sunnen · United States v. Munsingwear, Inc. · Pennsylvania v. Nelson · United States v. Fay Heasley, Fay Heasley and Selma Heasley v. United States of America and Henry W. Anderberg, Receiver, Fay Heasley and Selma Heasley v. United States of America and Henry W. Anderberg, Receiver

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.