Landsdown v. United States’s Empirical Analysis
348 F.2d 405 · 1965
Citation profile
59 federal appellate · 20 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 80 later decisions — most recently June 2014 · most notably United States v. Colbert (1973), Roberts v. United States (1969)
59 federal appellate · 20 state decisions — followed in 14 states
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Wong Sun v. United States · Kotteakos v. United States · Opper v. United States · Jencks v. United States · Smith v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 80 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The question whether a defendant has consented to a search and seizure of his property is one of fact, to be determined in the first instance by the trial court.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“admiftted] into evidence against the accused”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. People v. LaRosa
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.