Jackson v. Moore’s Empirical Analysis
348 F.2d 437 · 1965
Citation profile
3 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently May 1981
3 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Estes v. Texas · Linkletter v. Walker · Wabash Railroad Company v. Adelbert College of the Western Reserve University · Estes v. United States · 28 F. Supp. 462 - In Re American Fidelity Corporation
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Slipping into the familiar challenge to summary jurisdiction, Jackson asserts that the Bankruptcy Court had no power since the underlying subject was not in the custody of the Bankruptcy Court. . Our problem is not one of custody but of contracts made with the bankruptcy estate through the Bankruptcy Court. . The Court had summary jurisdiction to dispose of any controversies affecting the bankrupt estate arising out of the terms of the contract with the trustee.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.