Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 348 F.2d 502 - Benjamin v. United States

Benjamin v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

348 F.2d 502 · 1965

Citation profile

68
cited by 68 later decisions
April 1992
most recently cited

2 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 68 later decisions — most recently April 1992 · most notably Nager Electric Company, Inc. And Keystone Engineering Corporation v. The United States (1966), Algonac Manufacturing Co. v. United States (1970)

2 district ·

3701965197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2501

Relies on Douglas v. Alabama · Schillinger v. United States · United States v. El Paso Natural Gas Co. · Friedman v. United States · Friedman v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 68 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “* * * (1) a need for the property develops after it has been declared surplus and offered for sale, or (2) a serious mistake has been made, such as a grave price discrepancy between the true value of the item and the amount bid. [ 162 Ct.Cl. at 396 , 320 F.2d at 362 .]”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““To read the clause in [an] unlimited fashion — excusing all damages for any type of breach — would come close to (if not reach) the pit of voidness; the Government would in effect promise nothing although the other party would supposedly be bound.” [Id. (quoting Freedman, 162 Ct.Cl. at 403, 320 F.2d at 366 ) (footnote omitted).]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.