Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 348 F.2d 602 - Wacker v. Bisson

Wacker v. Bisson’s Empirical Analysis

348 F.2d 602 · 1965

Citation profile

73
cited by 73 later decisions
1
states following
February 2016
most recently cited

33 federal appellate · 8 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 73 later decisions — most recently February 2016 · most notably Escobedo v. United States (1980), Sindona v. Grant (1980)

33 federal appellate · 8 district · 1 state decisions

220196519701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Townsend v. Sain · Aetna Life Ins Co of Hartford Conn v. Haworth · Public Serv. Comm'n of Utah v. Wycoff Co. · Kerotest Mfg Co v. C-O-Two Fire Equipment Co · David Muskrat v.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 73 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[T]he question of the wisdom of extradition remains for the executive branch to decide.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““(a) Whether the evidence showed a reasonable ground to believe the accused guilty. (b) Whether the offense charged was a treaty offense. (c) Collaterally, whether Wacker had a full and fair hearing in the previous proceedings on those issues in this case which are serious.””
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[i]f the district court should conclude that Wacker has had a full and fair hearing in the two habeas proceedings on those issues in this case which are serious, there is no necessity for holding any additional evidentiary hearing.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.