United States v. Hall’s Empirical Analysis
348 F.2d 837 · 1965
Citation profile
67 federal appellate · 1 district · 4 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 77 later decisions — most recently July 1992 · most notably United States v. Burke (1975), United States v. Bozza (1966)
67 federal appellate · 1 district · 4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2314 · 18 U.S.C. § 371
Relies on Wong Sun v. United States · Carroll v. United States · Escobedo v. Illinois · Johnson v. United States · Ker v. State of California
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 77 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“it does not follow that the test of propriety with respect to the two subjects has been or should be precisely the same.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“would impose on the law of arrest a requirement thus far confined to the law of search and seizure”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.