Welsh v. United States’s Empirical Analysis
348 F.2d 885 · 1965
Citation profile
21 federal appellate · 22 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 53 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently October 2024 · most notably Dickey v. Florida (1970), State v. Hewett (1967)
21 federal appellate · 22 state decisions — followed in 17 states
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Pollard v. United States · Foti v. Immigration & Naturalization Service · McDonald v. United States · Dorsey v. United States · Crowe v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 53 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Appellate courts must assume, in the absence of anything in the record to the contrary, that delay in pronouncing sentence was for a lawful purpose in the orderly process of handling the case.””
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority““Petitioner also contends that he'was deprived of his constitutional right to assistance of counsel at the hearing when probation wás revoked. In addition'to'the fact that petitioner made no request for counsel at that'hearing, the constitutional right to the assistance of counsel in' the defense of a criminal prosecution, given by the Sixth 'Amendment,' does riot- apply to a hearing on á motion to revoke probation. Bennett v. United States, 158 F. 2d 412, 415 , C.A. 8th, cert. denied, 331 U.S. 822 , 67 S. Ct. 1302 , 91 L. Ed. 1838 ; Gillespie v. Hunter, 159 F. 2d 410, 411 , C.A. 10th; United States v. Huggins, 184 F. 2d 866, 868 , C.A. 7th; Crowe v. United States, 175 F. 2d 799, 801 , C.A. 4th, cert. denied 338 U.S. 950 , 70 S. Ct. 478 , 94 L. Ed. 586 . rehearing denied, 339 U.S. 916 , 70 S. Ct. 559 , 94 L. Ed. 1341 ; Richardson v. United States, 199 F. 2d 333, 335 , C.A. 10th; Cupp v. Byington, 179 F. Supp. 669, 670 , S.D. Ind. See: Gilpin v. United States, 265 F. 2d 203 , and cases cited at p. 204, C.A. 6th; Barker v. State of Ohio, 330 F. 2d 594 , and cases cited, C.A. 6th. “Judgment affirmed.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Hewett
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.