Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 348 F.2d 887 - Cullins v. Crouse

Cullins v. Crouse’s Empirical Analysis

348 F.2d 887 · 1965

Citation profile

25
cited by 25 later decisions
8
states following
September 2014
most recently cited

7 federal appellate · 14 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently September 2014 · most notably Lozada v. Warden, State Prison (1992), Brown v. State (2004)

7 federal appellate · 14 state decisions

90196519701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Fay v. Noia · Sanders v. United States · Bryan v. United States · 105 Cal. App. 2d 215 - In Re Keddy · Village of Ridgefield Park v. BERGEN COUNTY BOARD OF TAXATION

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ ‘Although the right to counsel in a civil case is not a matter of constitutional right under the Sixth Amendment, counsel should be appointed in post conviction matters when disposition cannot be made summarily on the face of the petition and record. When counsel is so appointed he must be effective and competent. Otherwise, the appointment is a useless formality.’ ” Brown, 278 Kan. at 484 .”
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““. . . Appellant through his counsel invoked the Kansas statute. The situation is of his own making and he may not now complain. . . .” (p. 889.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.