Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

348 F.2d 920

Docket No. 19998.

Van Hook v. Eklund

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals

August 5, 1965.

Rehearing Denied August 24, 1965.

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1965-08-05

2 counsel of record

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1965-08-05

How this case has been cited

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently March 1982

4 federal appellate ·

30196519701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California; Leon R. Yankwich, Judge.

Welton Van Hook, in pro. per.

Thomas C. Lynch, Atty. Gen. of California, Wm. E. James, Asst. Atty. Gen. of California, George J. Roth, Deputy Atty. Gen. of California, Los Angeles, Cal., for appellee.

Before BARNES, HAMLIN and ELY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

This cause came on to be heard on the record on appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California, without argument;

¶2

On consideration whereof, it is ordered and adjudged by this Court that the judgment of the District Court appealed from in this cause be, and is hereby, affirmed.

/348/f2d/920 · .json · Public domain