Joseph E. Pauly, Husband’s Empirical Analysis
2003
Citation profile
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Federal Crop Ins Corporation v. Merrill · Bowen v. Georgetown University Hospital · Heckler v. Community Health Services of Crawford County, Inc. · Gillespie v. United States Steel Corp. · Eastern Enterprises v. Apfel
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]he Paulys have not demonstrated affirmative government misconduct. They allege that they were misinformed about the terms of the SAA [shared appreciation agreement], but offer no evidence that the alleged misrepresentation was deliberate or fraudulent. They do not attempt to demonstrate that [the Department official who allegedly gave misinformation] was aware of the correct terms of SAA, let alone that he deliberately misled them.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. ESTATE OF“between the date of this Agreement and either the expiration date of this Agreement or the date Borrower pays the loan in full, ceases farming or transfers title of the security...”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. ESTATE OF“cannot bind the government beyond the scope of the statute granting them authority”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. ESTATE OF
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.