Heideman v. South Salt Lake City’s Empirical Analysis
348 F.3d 1182 · 2003
Citation profile
38 federal appellate · 57 district · 4 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 146 later decisions — most recently December 2024 · most notably Kos Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Andrx Corp. (2004), Centro Espirita Beneficiente Uniao Do Vegetal Udv-Usa v. Ashcroft H C F (2004)
38 federal appellate · 57 district · 4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Elrod v. Burns · United States v. O'Brien · Ward v. Rock Against Racism · Chaplinsky v. State of New Hampshire · Marks v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 146 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“`where a preliminary injunction seeks to stay governmental action taken in the public interest pursuant to a statutory or regulatory scheme, the less rigorous fair-ground-for-litigation standard should not be applied.'”
6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[t]he movant need only show `questions going to the merits so serious, substantial, difficult and doubtful, as to make them a fair ground for litigation.'”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“adopted the Second Circuit's liberal definition of the 'probability of success’ requirement.” Nova Health Sys. v. Edmondson, 460 F.3d 1295 , 1299 n. 6 (10th Cir.2006) (quoting Heideman v. S. Salt Lake City, 348 F.3d 1182, 1189 (10th Cir.2003)). Generally, where the moving party has established that the three”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.