Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 348 F.3d 1278 - Granite State Outdoor Advertising, Inc. v. City of St. Petersburg

Granite State Outdoor Advertising, Inc. v. City of St. Petersburg’s Empirical Analysis

348 F.3d 1278 · 2003

Citation profile

48
cited by 48 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
November 2020
most recently cited

19 federal appellate · 3 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 48 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently November 2020 · most notably Solantic, LLC v. City of Neptune Beach (2005), Granite State Outdoor Advertising, Inc. v. City of Clearwater (2003)

19 federal appellate · 3 district ·

420200320102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

Relationships

Relies on Carey v. Piphus · Ward v. Rock Against Racism · Farrar v. Hobby · Fw/pbs Inc II v. City of Dallas Mjr Inc · Freedman v. Maryland

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 48 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “found the remaining text to be constitutionally sound”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “In particular, ... the Court never stated time limits were per se required for a [content-neutral] permitting scheme to be valid. Rather, the Court simply held all that was required were `adequate standards to guide the official's discretion and render it subject to judicial review.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “The district court found the absence of time limits required it to grant summary judgment for Granite and invalidate the entire ordinance.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.