Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 348 F.3d 260 - United States v. Maple

United States v. Maple’s Empirical Analysis

348 F.3d 260 · 2003

Citation profile

21
cited by 21 later decisions
4
states following
April 2024
most recently cited

9 federal appellate · 4 district · 5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently April 2024

9 federal appellate · 4 district · 5 state decisions

170200320102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 21 U.S.C. § 844 (§ 404 of the Controlled Substances Act)

Relies on Katz v. United States · Whren v. United States · United States v. Ross · Mincey v. Arizona · South Dakota v. Opperman

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.