In Re Mi-Lor Corp.’s Empirical Analysis
2003
Citation profile
8
cited by 8 later decisions
3
states following
July 2010
most recently cited
2 district · 3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Donahue v. Rodd Electrotype Co. of New England, Inc. · Demoulas v. Demoulas Super Markets, Inc. · Consove v. Cohen · Harhen v. Brown · Sharon v. City of Newton
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the burden of proving or disproving its enforceability may lie with either party, depending on the context.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“A director or officer may be “interested” under Massachusetts law if she is a party to the transaction; has a business, financial or familial relationship with a party to the transaction; has a material pecuniary interest in the transaction; or is subject to a controlling influence by a party to the transaction who has a material pecuniary interest.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.