Tuggle v. Mangan’s Empirical Analysis
348 F.3d 714 · 2003
Citation profile
31 federal appellate · 10 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 60 later decisions — most recently July 2021 · most notably Davis v. Hall (2004), Littrell v. Franklin (2004)
31 federal appellate · 10 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 29 U.S.C. § 206 (Equal Pay Act of 1963) · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))
Relies on Harlow v. Fitzgerald · Mitchell v. Forsyth · Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc. · Meritor Savings Bank, FSB v. Vinson · Faragher v. City of Boca Raton
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 60 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“`More than a few isolated incidents are required,' and the alleged harassment must be `so intimidating, offensive, or hostile that it poisoned the work environment.'”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“must be extreme and not merely rude or unpleasant to affect the terms and conditions of employment.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“To establish a prima facie case of hostile work environment sexual harassment, [Leichliter] must prove (l)[s]he is a member of a protected group, (2)[s]he was subjected to unwelcome sexual harassment, (3) the harassment was based on sex, and (4) the harassment affected a term, condition, or privilege of [her] employment.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.