Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 348 F.3d 732 - Putman v. Unity Health System

Putman v. Unity Health System’s Empirical Analysis

348 F.3d 732 · 2003

Citation profile

130
cited by 130 later decisions
May 2024
most recently cited

49 federal appellate · 11 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 130 later decisions — most recently May 2024 · most notably Griffith v. City of Des Moines (2004), Stallings v. Hussmann Corp. (2006)

49 federal appellate · 11 district ·

640200320102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1981 (Civil Rights Act of 1866) · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 703 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964)

Relies on McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green · Texas Department of Community Affairs v. Burdine · Price Waterhouse v. Hopkins · Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Samara Bros. · Kiel v. Select Artificials, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 130 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “nonmoving party must `substantiate his allegations with sufficient probative evidence [that] would permit a finding in [his] favor based on more than mere speculation, conjecture, or fantasy.' Wilson v. Int'l Bus. Machs. Corp., 62 F.3d 237, 241 (8th Cir.1995)(quotation omitted).”
    10 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “after [his] discharge, he was replaced by a person with similar qualifications”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  3. “present a prima facie case of intentional discrimination.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.