Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 348 Mo. 900 - Lucas v. Lamb

Lucas v. Lamb’s Empirical Analysis

1941

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
1
states following
January 1984
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 9 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently January 1984

2 federal appellate · 9 state decisions

5019411950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Aetna Insurance v. Hyde · Aetna Insurance v. O'Malley · Aetna Ins Co v. Hyde · State Ex Rel. Abeille Fire Insurance v. Sevier · Aetna Insurance Co. v. Hyde

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “`The record shows that respondent (Lamb) rendered diligent and valuable services, and incurred expense; that his efforts contributed to the collection of a much larger sum for the benefit of the policyholders, or of the state, than might otherwise have been recovered. However, for the reasons stated, we are unable to permit him to retain compensation out of the fund collected.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.