Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 348 N.C. 377 - State v. Hipps

State v. Hipps’s Empirical Analysis

1998

Citation profile

100
cited by 100 later decisions
2
states following
March 2019
most recently cited

100 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 100 later decisions — most recently March 2019 · most notably Commonwealth v. English (1999), State v. Trull (1998)

100 state decisions

520199820002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Wainwright v. Witt · Nebraska v. Wyoming · Payless Wholesale Distributor, Inc. v. Albert Culver (P.R.) Inc. · Trident Associates Ltd. Partnership v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 100 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[r]emoteness for purposes of 404(b) must be considered in light of the specific facts of each case and the purposes for which the evidence is being offered ... [f]or some 404(b) purposes, remoteness in time is critical to the relevance of the evidence for those purposes; but for other purposes, remoteness may not be as important.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[T]he impropriety of the argument must be gross indeed in order for this Court to hold that a trial judge abused his discretion in not recognizing and correcting ex mero motu an argument which defense counsel apparently did not believe was prejudicial when he heard it.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “the standard of review is whether the argument was so grossly improper that the trial court erred in failing to intervene ex mero motu.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.