Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 348 N.C. 562 - Robinson v. Powell

Robinson v. Powell’s Empirical Analysis

1998

Citation profile

26
cited by 26 later decisions
1
states following
January 2026
most recently cited

24 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently January 2026 · most notably 182 N.C. App. 531 - Richardson v. Bank of America, N.A. (2007), 246 N.C. App. 576 - Piazza v. Kirkbride (2016)

24 state decisions

1601998200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Dickens v. Puryear · 99 N.C. App. 587 - Forbes v. Par Ten Group, Inc. · FORBES, III v. Par Ten Group, Inc. · 112 N.C. App. 484 - Miller v. Talton · 125 N.C. App. 736 - Grasty v. Grasty

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “if an affirmative defense required to be raised by a responsive pleading is sought to be raised for the first time in a motion for summary judgment, the motion must ordinarily refer expressly to the affirmative defense relied upon. Only in exceptional circumstances where the party opposing the motion has not been surprised and has had full opportunity to argue and present evidence will movant’s failure expressly to refer to the affirmative defense not be a bar to its consideration on summary judgment.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “a party shall affirmatively set forth any matter constituting an avoidance or affirmative defense.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.